Home Company Professionals Company Research Coverage Services Cases Alternative Energy
Events Reports & Commentary Wall Street Inside/OutSM Talking CreditSM Testimonials Contact Us The Whitehall Green Energy IndexTM

5 Conyers Farm Drive      Greenwich, CT 06831

Phone: 203-661-9199      Fax: 203-661-8778

New Page 1














 
Reports & Commentary

Yahoo Weighs Microsoft Bid
Market Comment, 2/8/2008


Yahoo Weighs Microsoft Bid: To Do, or Not To Do?

Apparently, the answer, at least for now, is not to do. Microsoft’s unsolicited $44.6 billion offer (now valued at $41.8 due to the subsequent drop in Microsoft’s share price) for the ailing Yahoo has reportedly been rejected by its board.  Given the company’s faltering stock (at least until the buyout offer) some investors might feel that the answer should be: “Yes! How fast can you close?” There is still the possibility that Microsoft may up its offer.  Just days before Microsoft’s offer, the company announced that its 2008 earnings outlook was uncertain and that it was cutting jobs and re-examining its operations – two highly defensive maneuvers and not the actions of a company optimistic about its revenue growth. The Microsoft offer of $31 per share (in cash and stock) came after months of speculation. On the news, Yahoo shares jumped to $28.38 from $19.18. We would have expected Yahoo to reply with a “yahoo!”  But that did not happen. Yahoo’s boilerplate reply was “we will take it into consideration” and the company immediately sought an alternative suitor. While many names were bandied about only one stood out as a viable candidate – Google. Curiously enough, shortly after Microsoft made its bid, Google issued a press release to the effect that “interested parties may want to consider the anti-competitive nature of the merger.” (Why not just call the justice department and ask them to begin an investigation).  

411: Number of The Justice Department Please?

In the days following the Microsoft offer, Google publicly raised its objections, claiming “that it could lead to less competition for Internet services and might create a new monopoly.” Given Google’s dominant position, about 75% of the paid search market worldwide, its monopoly allegation would seem highly hypocritical. Although Google is not considered a “friendly” suitor, just the lesser of two evils, its proven prowess at generating revenues from Internet search traffic would seem to be the cultural soul mate that might allow Yahoo to remain profitably independent. Investors have long called for Yahoo to outsource its own search advertising business (ironically, to Google). 

Bye, Bye, Yahoo

Yahoo has failed to keep pace with the changing marketplace. The Yahoo 2007 earnings release clearly indicated that it had seriously fallen behind in the development aspect of its business. Job cutting and strengthening operations have their place but for Yahoo its problem resides at the top and has so for an extended period. Yahoo has avoided outsourcing but it may be the best alternative to a take-over by Microsoft or Google. Neither scenario may be appealing to Yahoo’s management but time is not on its side. n



© 2008 Whitehall Financial Advisors LLC