|
RISK PREMIUM ANALYSIS:
Every Which Way But Up!
For the Tenth Week of 2008
Despite ongoing hearings
by Congress to address the worsening housing market and credit crisis,
stocks are still not showing any signs of a rebound. This week the Dow
Industrials drifted below 12,000 with little fanfare. Our Risk Premium
Index points to much lower levels ahead, perhaps testing even the 11,000
threshold. The Risk Premium Index continues to indicate that the bear
market is entrenched and that a downward revaluation of stock prices
shows no signs of abating.
HOPES FADE FOR A 100-BASIS POINT CUT IN FED
FUNDS RATES ON MARCH 18TH
We look to an additional
cut in the Fed funds rate on March 18th of at least 75-basis points,
lower than the 100-basis point estimate predicted by a consensus of
economists right after the previous reduction to 3.0% in mid-February.
Some economists feel that the Fed may lower rates by only 50-basis
points. We feel that the Fed cannot ignore the ever-more troubling
economic news which saw job losses in February climb to their highest
levels in five years and home foreclosures reached record levels. The
systemic weakness in the economy and the growing consensus view that a
recession is underway are also factors which we feel will lead the Fed
to opt for a higher rather than lower cut. With the lag effect the
benefits of reductions initiated in late 2007 have yet to be reflected
in the economic data, especially the hard-hit housing sector. We hope
that the Fed will be more aggressive and cut rates by 100-basis points.
Lowering the Fed funds rate is the best tool in the Feds “tool kit” for
addressing the housing free-fall. Anything less than a maximum effort
to bring interest rates down is not considered a positive, especially in
light of statistics released this week showing that homeowner’s share of
the equity in their homes fell to 49%, a record.
THORNBURG FAILS TO MEET MARGIN CALL
There was further
negative news. Thornburg Mortgage, a higher – end mortgage lender,
faced a liquidity crisis and was unable to meet a margin call, forcing
the company into a 30-day grace period before creditors could force it
into Chapter 11. Home mortgage default rates have reached the highest
levels in recent times and there is no reason to feel that housing
prices will cease falling or that the cost of home ownership is
lessening. And as if the credit markets were not bad enough, now comes
news that banks and brokerages are demanding that hedge fund customers
repay their loans or put up more cash or collateral to offset the
declining value of mortgage-backed bonds and other securities held in
their portfolios. Given the illiquid nature of the market, the
compulsory sale of securities would come at significant discounts. The
net effect was to pressure all sectors of the market and raise questions
as to whether or not Thornburg would be among the first companies unable
to satisfy margin calls, thereby accelerating the downward spiral of the
credit markets, not to mention the chilling effect on stocks.
AMBAC MANAGES TO SELL $1.5 BILLION OF EQUITY
Ambac gave the market
some pause this week when it announced on Wednesday afternoon that it
would release the details of a rescue plan at the close of trading. For
two hours the market waited with anxious anticipation only to be
disappointed to learn that Ambac’s bail-out plan involved selling $1.5
billion of stock, consisting of $1.25 billion common stock and $500 of
“other equity instruments,” substantially diluting existing
shareholders’ holdings.
When it was all was said
and done, Ambac secured $1.5 billion of equity which was raised through:
$1.25 billion of common stock, priced at $6.75, a $50 million private
placement sold to Cerberus Management, a private equity firm. An
additional $250 million was raised through the sale of “equity notes,”
which are effectively convertible securities, thereby bringing the total
equity infusion to a grand total of $1.5 billion. Ambac announced that
it would generate an additional $600 million by suspending its risky
structured finance business for at least six months, a move expected to
raise its capital base to $2.1 billion. This capital raising program
seems to have appeased the rating agencies and the capital markets since
the ability to raise $$2.0 billion of equity as an intermediate goal
enabled Ambac to evade a downgrade at this time.
Ambac managed to sell
$1.25 billion in common stock and $250 million in equity equivalents
(securities which receive “equity treatment” by the rating agencies).
Both Moody’s and S&P responded by commenting that the $1.5 billion
equity infusion would suffice for now and stave off a ratings downgrade.
The outlook, is still listed as Negative. In our opinion, Ambac
is to be commended for the ability to secure as much as they did in a
market that seemed unreceptive to its earlier financing plans. The
market was frustrated with Ambac’s recapitalization plan in that
investors had been hoping for a larger capital infusion. Shares of
Ambac closed the week at $7.33, down 72% since the end of last year.
THE FED EXTENDS A $200 BILLION LIFELINE FOR
BANKS IN THE FACE OF HIGHER JOBLESS FIGURES AND DATA INDICATING THAT
AMERICANS ARE GETTING POORER
The mounting sense of financial disarray
encouraged the Fed to introduce a new emergency measure to bolster
inter-bank liquidity and make it easier for banks to borrow funds. The
Fed plans to expand to $200 billion the amount it lends to banks in one
month. The news could not have come a moment to soon as the Fed’s
announcement came on the heels of news that the U.S. lost 63,000 jobs in
February, the second strait down-month in a row. The sharp rise in job
losses heightens the probability that the U.S. economy is in a
recession. And as if the economic news for the week wasn’t disturbing
enough, recent data showed that American households are getting poorer,
with wealth falling in the fourth quarter by $533 billion to $57,718 trillion.
The lower wealth
figures do not augur well for an upswing in consumer spending, dashing
hopes that consumers will lead the economy out of a recession thus
making the low cost retail benchmark, Wal-Mart, the store of last resort.
As we have noted in the past, the profile of each recession is
different. We do not share the view that consumers can, or will, pull
the economy out of this slump since housing is pulling the economy down,
and only when it begins to rebound can investors expect a
reversal in the current economic decline. Housing by its nature has a
long turn-around cycle. Given the unprecedented housing crisis,
expectations of a short and shallow recession do not seem realistic. We
are looking to at least 2009 before the housing sector returns to
health.
A BACKDOOR APPROACH TO LOWERING INTEREST
RATES
Barney Frank, chairman
of the House Financial Services Committee, has called upon the Federal
Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke to suggest possible ways to help reduce
foreclosures.
The House committee has
proposed providing the Federal Housing Administration a $20 billion
grant to purchase troubled mortgages and asked the Federal Reserve for
its assistance. While this amount pales in comparison to the amount of
troubled mortgage debt, it should provide more targeted relief than the
President’s stimulus plan. Such an initiative though would have to
clear many hurdles before it could becomes law, not the least of which
would be a positive ruling by the Treasury Department regarding the tax
consequences of a partial loan forgiveness contained in the mortgage
moratorium and bailout proposals. A negative ruling would probably
offset the benefits of these proposals.
Bernanke’s support for
the House’s proposals came in a speech before the Independent Community
Bankers of America. The endorsement by Bernanke is critical because the
chairman acknowledges that lowering interest rates (i.e. the monthly
carrying cost of mortgages) may be insufficient to turn the housing
market around. The fact that homeowners have negative home equity,
which means that a house is worth less than its mortgage, increases the
chance the homeowners will walk away from their homes, resulting in a
higher delinquency and foreclosure rates. Homeowners face the added
burden that if a lender foreclosures on a house at a price lower than
the face amount of a mortgage, the difference is considered a taxable
gain by the IRS. It is important to stem the tide of foreclosure rates
because as long as the U.S. has an increasing delinquency rate, banks
and other lending institutions face the specter of additional
write-off’s, effectively weakening their balance sheets which have
already been decimated by non-performing mortgages.
The House committee
hopes that a Federal government intervention will help homeowners as
well as reduce investor fears of a major bank failure. In this regard,
the Fed is stepping outside of its monetary policy brief. Bernanke had
a clear opinion on the subject and advocated some type of loan
forgiveness in order to stem the rate of foreclosure, thereby
alleviating some of the pressure in U.S. home sales. Home prices have
been declining nationwide for over a year. At the end of 2007, 7% of
home mortgages had negative equity and some estimate that this figure
could rise above 20%.
Our Risk Premium analysis remains in
bearish territory as the market appears to be “pricing risk” in,
resulting in contracting P/E multiples.
For the week ending March 14th the
risk premium results are illustrated by the yellow line:
§
The Industrial Risk Premium ended at 6.93% versus 6.72%
§
The Transportation Risk Premium decreased to 7.22% from
7.24%
§
The Utility Risk Premium remained unchanged at 6.76%
n
|
Date |
February 29, 2008 |
Date |
March 7, 2008 |
|
DJ Industrial Risk Premium |
6.72% |
DJ Industrial Risk Premium |
6.93% |
|
30 Year Treasury |
4.59% |
30 Year Treasury |
4.53% |
|
Industrial Risk Differential |
2.13% |
Industrial Risk Differential |
2.40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
February 29, 2008 |
Date |
March 7, 2008 |
|
DJ Transportations Risk Premium |
7.24% |
DJ Transportations Risk Premium |
7.22% |
|
30 Year Treasury |
4.59% |
30 Year Treasury |
4.53% |
|
Transportation Risk Differential |
2.65% |
Transportation Risk Differential |
2.69% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
February 29, 2008 |
Date |
March 7, 2008 |
|
DJ Utility Risk Premium |
6.76% |
DJ Utility Risk Premium |
6.76% |
|
30 Year Treasury |
4.59% |
30 Year Treasury |
4.53% |
|
Utility Risk Differential |
2.17% |
Utility Risk Differential |
2.23% |
Continues ▼

Continues ▼

Continues ▼

For February 29th's Comment Please Click Here
For February 22nd's Comment Please Click Here
For February 15th's Comment Please Click Here
For February 8th's Comment Please Click Here
For February 1st's Comment Please Click Here
For January
25th's Comment Please Click Here
For January
18th's Comment Please Click Here
For January
11th's Comment Please Click Here
For January 4th's Comment Please Click Here
For December 28th's Comment Please Click Here
For December 21st's Comment Please Click Here
For December 14th's Comment Please Click Here
For December 7th's Comment Please Click Here
For November 30th's Comment Please Click Here
For November 23rd's Comment Please Click Here
For November 16th's Comment Please Click Here.
For Additional Information or Questions Please
Contact
Us. |