|
Risk Premiums For The Dow Indices
November 21st, 2008
HAS THE MARKET BOTTOMED OUT?
The answer is
NO! This is not the bottom based on our Risk Premium Model. Is it
prudent to purchase stocks with the automakers on the brink of collapse
with the market yielding anomalies that may very well force a revamping
of how “financial risk” is evaluated?
For instance, the dividend yield on the Dow Jones Industrial
Average is currently 3.88% and the Dow Utilities 4.43%, a 55 basis-point
differential.
The narrowing gap between industrial and utility dividend
averages illustrates investor apprehension, particularly the lack of
confidence in earnings and dividend growth prospects.
The historically lofty dividend returns and future growth
potential provided by the industrials, especially relative to the long
standing bond-surrogate nature of utilities, reflects an earnings-growth
inversion this author has never witnessed
in more
than 30 years as
an analyst.
AN INVESTMENT APPROACH (WITH A HIGH-RISK TOLERANCE)
We have to
caution investors to refrain from broad-based equity exposure.
However, for those having the need for an equity presence, the
best guidance we are able to give is to select super-high quality
companies and expect a long holding period (perhaps, five years).
In addition, investors should consider redeemable preferred
stocks and Triple-B corporate bonds maturing in under three years which
are selling at discounts and offering yields in excess of 10% - a figure
which we think should be moved up today to 11% to 12%.
These securities should be analyzed on a ability to pay at
maturity based upon a heavy review of internally generated cash flow,
the ability to liquidate short and long term assets and overall
financial flexibility. In
effect, a classic bankruptcy probability despite the current investment
rating(s).
BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR, YOU MIGHT JUST GET IT
This slight twist on the old adage would appear more appropriate than
ever in the wake of the Congressional hearing on the auto industry’s
plea for federal aid which fell on mostly deaf ears. That body this week
refused to approve a rescue plan for the three U.S. automakers. Instead,
they sent them packing, telling their chief executives to craft a
self-help proposal rather than count on direct financial relief (at
least for now) from the federal government.
In effect, Congress told the auto industry to devise a Plan B, a
potentially scary scenario for the economy since that may begin with the
bankruptcy
word. While
populist-professing politicians are less than comfortable helping bail
out well-heeled financial executives and their institutions (their hands
were forced by doomsday predictions) legislators’ more ideologically
capitalistic colleagues are wary about extending financial aid beyond
this sector since it would undoubtedly draw an endless stream of
beggars.
THE MORAL HAZARD MYTH MEETS REALITY
It is not
reasonable to expect that the government can become the lender of last
rest for all corporate America.
Nevertheless, during this difficult and worsening economic
crisis, our leaders should be able to judiciously select industries as
vital to the economy as our financial institutions for helping.
The U.S. auto industry clearly qualifies with nearly one million
jobs dependent on the sector (250,000 directly and some 730,000 in
co-dependent businesses).
The ripple effect of a shutdown would be devastating for the U.S.
economy. Legislators, labor unions and environmentalists have hounded
the auto sector for the past 25 years, saddling it with higher
production costs, thereby weakening their competitive position.
Unfortunately, few industries can withstand the perennial pounding that
the carmakers have. Now the time may have come to “pay the piper” at a
price that may very well shock the public.
THE BEST PERFORMING STOCK?
A final note: it is truly unbelievable when Ford makes
the daily
Best
Performing
list closing down at pennies over a dollar, a disturbing commentary on
the bankrupt status of the economy.
§
The Industrial Risk Premium for the week ended November 21st
advanced to 10.30% versus 9.77% in the prior week
§
Over the same period
the Transportation
Risk Premium reached 9.45% from 9.36%
§ Finally,
the Utility Risk Premium number remained the same week-over-week,
closing at 8.96%
|
Date |
November 14, 2008 |
Date |
November 21, 2008 |
| Total DJ
Industrial Risk Premium |
9.77% |
Total DJ Industrial Risk Premium |
10.30% |
| 30 Year
Treasury |
4.22% |
30 Year Treasury |
3.70% |
|
Industrial Risk Differential |
5.55% |
Industrial Risk Differential |
6.60% |
| |
|
|
|
| Date |
November 14, 2008 |
Date |
November 21, 2008 |
| Total DJ
Transportations Risk Premium |
9.36% |
Total DJ Transportations Risk Premium |
9.45% |
| 30 Year
Treasury |
4.22% |
30 Year Treasury |
3.70% |
|
Transportation Risk Differential |
0.92% |
Transportation Risk Differential |
2.05% |
| |
|
|
|
| Date |
November 14, 2008 |
Date |
November 21, 2008 |
| Total DJ
Utility Risk Premium |
8.96% |
Total DJ Utility Risk Premium |
8.96% |
| 30 Year
Treasury |
4.22% |
30 Year Treasury |
3.70% |
| Utility
Risk Differential |
4.74% |
Utility Risk Differential |
5.26% |
| © 2009 Whitehall Financial Advisors LLC |
Continues ▼

Continues ▼

Continues ▼

For Additional Information or Questions Please
Contact
Us. |